Legal Opinion

Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1992No. D-2327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lease dispute, two employees of Credit Motors, Inc. were identified by name in Michael Hogan’s answers to interrogatories as persons having knowledge of relevant facts. Because their addresses and phone numbers were omitted, the trial court refused to permit Hogan to call them as witnesses. Tex.R.Civ.P. 215, subd. 5. The court of appeals reversed. 827 S.W.2d 392.

In denying the application for writ of error, we are not to be construed as ap*361proving or disapproving the court of appeals’ reliance on TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991), in determining…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hogan v. Credit Motors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boone v. LeGalley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  2. Mayfield v. PeekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  4. Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  5. Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API