Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Sotelo

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1971No. 19006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

18 Cal.App.3d 9 (1971)

95 Cal. Rptr. 486

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ESTHER ODESAY SOTELO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. 19006.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

June 9, 1971.

COUNSEL

Byron & Warner and Harvey E. Byron for Defendants and Appellants.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and James H. Kline, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

LILLIE, J.

In the same information but in separate counts defendants were charged with possession of heroin for sale (§ 11500.5, Health &…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. SaldanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. State v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API