Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Stilphen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 5, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On exceptions by plaintiff. Sustained. Real action to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant filed a plea in abatement to the writ. To this plea the plaintiff -filed a demurrer which was joined by the defendant. The presiding Justice overruled the demurrer, sustained the plea in abatement and ordered the writ and declaration to be quashed. To this ruling the plaintiff excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.

This is' a writ of entry brought by the plaintiff, as executor of the will of Nathaniel K. Chadwick late of Catskill in the State of New York, for the purpose of obtaining possession of the premises therein described situated in the county of Kennebec and State of Maine, in order to foreclose a mortgage thereof given by the defendant to the plaintiff’s testator.

Nathaniel K. Chadwick died in May, 1906. By his will he appointed his wife Celia S. Chadwick and his son George H. Chadwick, the plaintiff in this action co-executors of the will. They accepted the trust and received letters…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pickering v. PickeringSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1940
  2. RoyalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  3. Fort Fairfield Nash Co. v. NoltemierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API