Legal Opinion

Fort Fairfield Nash Co. v. Noltemier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Report in equity on agreed statement of facts. Sec. 56, Chap. 91, R. S. 1930. The complainants seek to enjoin and restrain the respondent from the enforcement of two judgments (and executions issued thereon), alleged to have been unlawfully recovered by him as a foreign executor.

Otto Baumer, residing in New Jersey, sued the Fort Fairfield Nash Company on its overdue promissory notes and entered his writ at the November Term, 1931, of the Superior Court in Aroostook County, where the Company, a Maine corporation, had its place of business. Its attorney answered and by agreement the action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Langdon v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Brantley's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  4. Anthes v. AnthesIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Gregory v. McCormickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Brabham v. Mississippi Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Brabham v. Mississippi Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API