Legal Opinion
Arrellano-Flores v. Hoy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1958No. 15747PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
Arrellano-Flores is a citizen and national of the Republic of Mexico who was lawfully admitted to the United States in 1925. After administrative proceedings the district director of Immigration and Naturalization is about to deport him under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251 (a) (11) because he has been found guilty after a California trial on a criminal charge that he unlawfully sold marihuana, a substance classified as a narcotic.
On review, the district court upheld the director. The principal issue is: Has the alien been “convicted?” This is an ingredient of the aforementioned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re MoreheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- United States ex rel. Freislinger v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- People v. ChristmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by20 opinions
- A-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
- Edward Charles Wood v. Richard C. Hoy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Maximilliano De La Cruz-Martinez, Also Known as Max Cruz, Max De La Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961
- Samuel Murillo Gutierrez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.