Legal Opinion

State v. Mayes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 29, 1979No. [No. 44, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

Certiorari was granted in this consolidated criminal cause to review the judgments of the Court of Special Appeals upholding dismissal of the separate multi-count indictments returned against respondents James I. Mayes, Jacquelyn Mayes, and John W. Gooding. State v. Mayes, 39 Md. App. 635, 387 A. 2d 794 (1978). Finding that the three indictments were not validly obtained under the federal wiretap law and, consequently, were properly dismissed, we will affirm that court’s determination.

Prior to a discussion of the reasons for our decision in this case, we think it helpful to digress briefly…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. State v. PolitteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API