Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Moss

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 12, 1975No. 58833PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

In this original proceeding in prohibition, relator-intervenor seeks to prohibit respondent judge from dismissing its cross claim for indemnity against defendant.

The plaintiffs in the underlying action are insured by the relator for liability and uninsured motorist coverage. On October 31, 1972, plaintiff Mrs. Harris had a collision with a utility pole as a result of the alleged negligence of Nelson Tenney, who had no physical contact with the Harris vehicle. Mrs. Harris, asserting she had been injured by the alleged negligence of Tenney, filed suit against him for damages. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Kroeker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Reed CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Payway Feed Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Listerman v. Day and Night Plumbing & Heating Serv.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Craig v. Iowa Kemper Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rister Ex Rel. Rister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Alsbach v. BaderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API