Legal Opinion
In Re Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided March 31, 2003No. CS-01-0278-EFSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHEA, District Judge.
On March 18, 2003, the Court heard argument on the parties Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, (Ct. Rees. 214; 228), The Court also considered the Organic Intervening Defendants’ Motion to Join in Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Ct.Rec.238). The Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (“the Commission”) 1 was represented at the hearing James M. Danielson, and Peter A. Spadoni. The named Defendants were represented by represented by Robert Llewellyn…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Summit Medical Center of Alabama, Inc. v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
- Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. BontaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.