Legal Opinion
Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 5, 2005No. 1:04 CV 1205 LEK/DRHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER1
KAHN, District Judge.
I. Background
On January 31, 2005, Plaintiff Candidates William M. Hoblock and Lee R. Carman (hereafter “Candidates”) filed a Motion to Intervene in the above-captioned matter, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. Motion to Intervene (Dkt. No. 21). Candidates seek intervention as a matter of right under Federal Rule 24(a)(2), or permissive intervention under Federal Rule 24(b)(2). Mem. of Law in Support (Dkt. No. 21) at 1. Defendants oppose the Motion, and have submitted briefing in opposition. Defts’ Mem. of Law in Opp. (Dkt. No.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Dorsett v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Hoblock v. Albany County Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Hoblock v. Albany County Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Doe v. ZuckerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.