Legal Opinion

Jim Fair and Jim Hinnant, Both Individually and as Representative of the Class of Similarly Situated Residents of of the State of Florida v. Jim Sebesta, as Supervisor of Elections, Hillsborough County, Florida, Etc., Joel Francis Woodman, Individually, and Joel Francis Woodman, as Representative of the Class, Etc. v. James Sebesta, Supervisor of Elections, Hillsborough County, Florida

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1973No. 72-3301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

475 F.2d 1140

Jim FAIR and Jim Hinnant, both Individually and as

representative of the class of similarly situated

residents of of the State of Florida,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Jim SEBESTA, as Supervisor of Elections, Hillsborough

County, Florida, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Joel Francis WOODMAN, Individually, and Joel Francis

Woodman, as representative of the class, etc., et

al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

James SEBESTA, Supervisor of Elections, Hillsborough County,

Florida, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 72-3301, 72-3300 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

April…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Hinnant v. SebestaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinnant v. SebestaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
  2. Meyers v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API