Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Jackson

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1975No. LR-74-C-320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This clause, in which a District Court of three Judges has been empaneled, is now before the Court on the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

I

Plaintiff is an adult citizen of Pulaski County, Arkansas; defendant is the County Clerk and ex officio Permanent Voter Registrar of Pulaski County. Plaintiff sues on his own behalf and on behalf of all other citizens of Arkansas similarly situated. The defendant is sued in his own official capacity and also as representative of a class consisting of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Marston v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Burns v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hinnant v. SebestaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
  5. Hinnant v. SebestaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1976
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API