Legal Opinion

Ramos v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 2001No. 2-98-493-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Manuel Garcia Ramos appeals his conviction for the offenses of intoxication manslaughter and felony driving while intoxicated. In twenty points of error, Appellant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, that the trial court reversibly erred by failing to admonish him of the applicable range of punishments, and that the trial court erred by admitting evidence that Appellant had no driver’s license at the time of the accident due to his failure to pay the reinstatement fee, thereby creating an irrelevant and inadmissible…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dana Leslie Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  2. David Lee McGee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  3. David Lee McGee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  4. David Wilson Heinze, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. David Wilson Heinze, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API