Warner v. Van F. Belknap Co.

This is an appeal, on leave granted, from an interlocutory order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ bill of complaint on the grounds that (1) there is misjoinder of parties plaintiff, (2) misjoinder of parties defendant, and (3) the bill is duplicitous and multifarious.

In their bill plaintiffs charge, in effect, that they, husband and wife, own 45% of the capital stock of defendant Belknap corporation and the individual defendants, husband and wife, own 55% ; that the capital stock of defendant Northland corporation is divided, 45% to plaintiff husband and 55% to defendant…