Legal Opinion

Mt. Hood Community College v. Kim

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. 86-09851; CA A62516Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order on remand. In the earlier review, we remanded, because the referee’s order, which the Board adopted, was inadequate for review. Kim v. Mt. Hood Community College, 95 Or App 406, 769 P2d 239 (1989). We affirm.

The facts are set out in our earlier opinion. On remand, the Board correctly stated that the issue is whether claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. It then identified seven factors to consider in determining whether there is a sufficient relationship between the injury and the employment so that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Kim v. Mt. Hood Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API