Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Husted v. Seneca Steel Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1975Published

1Dissent

Larkin, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. In our view the question presented is whether an inside employee involved in an automobile accident on a public highway while on his way to work, whose injuries are sustained on the employer’s premises, has been injured in the course of his employment and is entitled to compensation.

Although the premises of an employer, for compensation purposes, includes a parking lot maintained for employees (Malinka v Mugavero, 27 AD2d 691), only under limited circumstances has the concept of the precinct or area of employment been extended to situations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Claim of Gaik v. National Aniline DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Claim of Flanagan v. Ward Leonard Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  5. Claim of Ott v. Gem Electric Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API