Legal Opinion

Nagle v. Jin Suey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1930No. 6083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

IAppellee sought admission as the foreign-born son of one Jin Fung For, who, it is conceded, is by birth a citizen of and resides in the United States. Holding the evidence to be insufficient to establish the alleged paternity, the administrative officers denied the application, whereupon the applicant brought tbis proceeding, in habeas corjrns, and from an order below granting his prayer the Commissioner of Immigration. appeals.

But for certain discrepancies in the testimony to which we shall later refer, unquestionably the applicant made a very strong case in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Go Lun v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. Nagle v. Dong MingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Nagle v. Wong Ngook HongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Lim Tung Noy v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mar Gong v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Fong Look v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. In re Gee Nay WaiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API