Legal Opinion
Go Lun v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 1927No. 5146PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant based his right to admission to the United States on the claim of citizenship through his father. The testimony heard before the immigration authorities was given by the appellant, his father, and a prior landed brother, and, as said by the court in Johnson v. Ng Ling Fong (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 11:
“The téstimony of the applicant and of his alleged oldest brother and father, given before the immigration authorities, shows that they were interrogated as to substantially every…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tisi v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Johnson v. Damon Ex Rel. Leung Fook YungCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Johnson v. Ng Ling Fong ex rel. Ng Wah SunCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
3Cited by15 opinions
- Louie Lung Gooey v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States Ex Rel. Fong Lung Sing v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Mason Ex Rel. Lee Wing You v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- O'Connell ex rel. Kwong Han Foo v. WardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Fong Tan Jew ex rel. Chin Hong Fun v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.