Legal Opinion

Becker v. Schellinger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1976No. 45733PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This employee seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his claim for temporary partial disability benefits. The legal issue raised on appeal was recently decided in LeMieux v. Mortenson, 306 Minn. 50, 234 N. W. 2d 897 (1975). Although this appeal presents some factual differences from LeMieux, they are differences without legal significance.

The dissenting commissioner expressed concern for the ability of the employee to continue in his present employment subject to his dis ability. Should the employee become unable to do so, appropriate relief would be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lemieux v. MortensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Ahoe v. Quality Park ProductsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Briese v. Hagen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Ahoe v. Quality Park ProductsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API