Legal Opinion

Ahoe v. Quality Park Products

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1977No. 46490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

Relators, Quality Park Products and its compensation insurer, seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (now the Worker’s Compensation Court of Appeals) awarding respondent employee benefits for temporary total and temporary partial disability. Relators contend that a prior award which terminated benefits for temporary total disability is res judicata as to employee’s claim of continuing temporary total disability and that she is not entitled to compensation because she voluntarily terminated her employment in September 1974; that she has demonstrated ability…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Bajdek's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. P. P. G. Industries, Inc. v. AitesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. John W. Galbreath & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Grgurich v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Ahoe v. Quality Park ProductsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API