Legal Opinion

State v. Castillo

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1985No. 15060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Carlos Castillo appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732. Castillo contends on appeal that the district court erred by not suppressing evidence Castillo believes was illegally obtained; that a fatal variance occurred between the offense charged in the information and the evidence presented; and that the state failed to prove a specific criminal intent required under the statute. We affirm.

Castillo is a resident of California. In May of 1981, Castillo mailed a letter to his brother, Raymond, who was living in Glenns…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. John W. Cash, II v. Fleming Williams, Sheriff of Williamson County, Tennessee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. People v. WolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KopsaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In re Albert S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. State v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. State v. CharltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API