Legal Opinion

People v. Wolder

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1970No. Crim. 16373PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Statement of the Case

Defendants were jointly charged by information with the crime of burglary, a felony. (Pen. Code, § 459.) By amendment to the information Wolder was alleged to have suffered prior felony convictions for forgery, burglary, violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code, and robbery, and to have served a term in state prison upon each such prior. Burch was alleged to have suffered a prior conviction for robbery, and to have served a term of imprisonment therefor in state prison. Motions under section 995, Penal Code were made and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. TarantinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. State v. LudvikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Dyas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. MangieficoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API