Weible, R. v. Wells, W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
LAZARUS, J.:
William P. Wells and Elizabeth Louise Wells (the Wellses) appeal from the trial court’s order ejecting them from the subject property, a portion of Appellant Rodger Weible’s property, and ordering them to pay to resurvey the line between the parties’ properties. The trial court concluded that the Wellses did not adversely possess *1222the subject property because they only demonstrated the required elements of adverse possession for 20 years before local counties, predecessors in title to Weible, became the owners of and publicly used the property. After careful review, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Flannery v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Brennan v. Manchester Crossings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Reed v. WolyniecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Arcadia Co., Inc. v. PelesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. F. GaldoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Hockman, K. v. Hursh, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Muir, N. & T. v. Heller, Ertley and ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Reese, J. v. Dore, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Weible, R. v. Wells, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.