Anderson v. Merck & Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMY ANDERSON, Case No. 22-cv-02991-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND 9 v. DENYING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 MERCK & CO., INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants. 11 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Merck 14 & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLC (“Defendants”). 15 The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. 16 For the reasons that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.