Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Merck & Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 21, 2022No. 4:22-cv-02991Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMY ANDERSON, Case No. 22-cv-02991-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND 9 v. DENYING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 MERCK & CO., INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants. 11 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Merck 14 & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Organon & Co., and Organon, LLC (“Defendants”). 15 The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. 16 For the reasons that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API