State v. Hunn

OPINION

REYES, Judge

The state appeals the district court’s order granting respondent’s motion to suppress urine-test results, arguing that the district court erroneously concluded that compliance with Minnesota’s implied-consent law, including advisement of a suspect’s limited right to counsel before consenting to chemical testing, is a prerequisite to the admissibility of chemical-test results in a criminal DWI prosecution. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On February 21, 2016, at approximately 1:09 a.m., a Mower County Deputy Sheriff (the deputy) pulled over respondent Scott Ross Hunn’s vehicle…