Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Laflin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1851PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Assumpsit upon a note, or due bill, dated January 12th, 1846, for the payment of 295 dollars on or before the 8th of March next ensuing.

The defendant filed five pleas. 1st. The general issue; 2d. Payment; 3d. No consideration; 4th. Ageneral plea of fraud.

The 5th was a special plea intended to show that the note was given without consideration. It alleged that on the 4th of January, 1846, the plaintiff and defendant were joint owners of a lot of hogs, which they drove to the town of Hamilton, Ohio, and sold to one Me Clary, on a credit, for 1,100 dollars, to be paid on the 8th of March, 1846.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abrams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Mahan v. Sherman ex rel. Wabash & Erie Packet Boat Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Ramsey v. KochenourIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  4. State ex rel. Bird v. HoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Port v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. McDonald v. ElfesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Potter v. EarnestIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Leonard v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stewart v. BabbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API