Harvey v. Laflin
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Assumpsit upon a note, or due bill, dated January 12th, 1846, for the payment of 295 dollars on or before the 8th of March next ensuing.
The defendant filed five pleas. 1st. The general issue; 2d. Payment; 3d. No consideration; 4th. Ageneral plea of fraud.
The 5th was a special plea intended to show that the note was given without consideration. It alleged that on the 4th of January, 1846, the plaintiff and defendant were joint owners of a lot of hogs, which they drove to the town of Hamilton, Ohio, and sold to one Me Clary, on a credit, for 1,100 dollars, to be paid on the 8th of March, 1846.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abrams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Mahan v. Sherman ex rel. Wabash & Erie Packet Boat Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Ramsey v. KochenourIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- State ex rel. Bird v. HoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
3Cited by9 opinions
- Port v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- McDonald v. ElfesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Potter v. EarnestIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Leonard v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stewart v. BabbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.