Legal Opinion
Vandenbroeck v. Contimortgage Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 18, 1999No. 1:98-cv-00800PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Sandra VanDenBroeck, Eugene and Carol Nichoson, and Abel and Denise Soto, filed this action on October 16, 1998, in Kent County Circuit Court on behalf of themselves and others against Defendants, CommonPoint Mortgage Company (“CommonPoint”), ContiMort-gage Corporation (“ContiMortgage”), and GreenTree Financial Corporation (“Green-Tree”). In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged state law claims for violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”), M.C.L. §§ 445.901 to .922, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment, arising out of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Edward L. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, a Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dash v. FIRSTPLUS HOME LOAN TRUST 1996-2District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Cooper v. First Government Mortg. and Investors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Mull v. Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Short v. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
- Williams v. FirstPlus Home Loan Trust 1996-2District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.