Legal Opinion

Bowyer v. Loftus

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2008No. DA 07-0463PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 The Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Elenburg Exploration, Inc. (Elenburg), in this action for damages resulting from an automobile collision. J ames Bowyer and Dorothy Bowyer (Bowyers) appeal. We affirm.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in concluding that Shane Loftus was not acting within the course and scope of his employment for Elenburg at the time of the automobile collision.

BACKGROUND

¶3 Shane Loftus (Loftus) was employed by Elenburg as a well driller. In that capacity, he traveled to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kornec v. Mike Horse Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Keller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gentry Ex Rel. Gentry v. Douglas Hereford Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Makoske v. LombardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denke v. ShoemakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. GOETTEL v. Estate of BallardMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Waters v. BlaggMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. L.B. v. United StatesMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. T. Brenden v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API