Fagan v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Arnold,
This appeal involves the narrow issue as to whether the court below erred in affirming the action of the Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment refusing appellants’ application for a variance.
The case comes before us on the broadest form of certiorari, since the Enabling Act of May 6, 1929, P.L. 1551, 53 PS §3822 et seq. is silent regarding appeals. As stated in Garner v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 388 Pa. 98, 130 A. 2d 148, at page 100, our scope of review is to determine . . if the evidence sustains the findings of the court below, or if there is a manifest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Peirce AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Silverco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- MacK Zoning AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nettleton v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Wrightstown TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Yocum Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Zoning Board of Adjustment v. KoehlerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.