Legal Opinion

Schirf v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Before the Court is the appeal of Grant D. Schirf (Claimant) from an order of Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s order dismissing his claim petition.

Claimant was a “broach operator”1 for Blairsville Machine Products (Employer), for whom he had worked for thirteen years. On April 3, 1991, he asked for and received permission to take home an A-frame hoist which he needed to remove and replace an engine for his personal car. He testified that he was given permission by Warren Lockard, his supervisor, and was issued a “plant pass” to remove the hoist.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dana Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Hemmler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Scott v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Moss v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Black v. JamisonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Grill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Grill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API