Legal Opinion
United States v. Libby, McNeil & Libby
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 7, 1952No. 6445-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from continuing to operate its salmon trap on a site within the boundaries of the Hy-daburg Indian Reservation in Alaska, and also to recover damages.
The reservation, comprising land and navigable waters of the Pacific Ocean, was established by an order of the Secretary of the Interior of November 30, 1949, 14 F.R. 7318, pursuant to Section 2 of the Act of May 1, 1936, 49 Stat. 1250, 48 U.S.C.A. § 358a. This .suit was commenced May 3, 1951.
The defendant has operated the trap on the site in controversy since 1927 under a War…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Russian-American Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. McIntireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reserve v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. EganAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Native Village of Stevens v. Alaska Management & PlanningAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.