Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Committee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1992No. C7-91-1898Published
1Opinion of the Court
478 N.W.2d 337 (1991)
In the MATTER OF a Complaint Against the SANDY PAPPAS SENATE COMMITTEE.
No. C7-91-1898.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
December 17, 1991.
Review Granted January 22, 1992.
Raymond Faricy, Jr., St. Paul, for relator Russell Doty.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Martha Casserly, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent Ethical Practices Bd.
Kenneth Tilsen, St. Paul, for respondent Sandy Pappas for Senate Committee.
Considered at Special Term and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and AMUNDSON, JJ.
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
FACTS
Russell Doty filed a complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers, & Land Surveyors v. GetsugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- In Re the Implementation of Utility Energy Conservation Improvement ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.