Legal Opinion

Zambrana v. United States

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 28, 1992No. HCR 91-243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court for resolution of the pro se, incarcerated defendant’s “Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody.” The government responded pursuant to the court’s order under Rule 4(b) of the § 2255 Rules, and the defendant replied. 1

I. BACKGROUND

This court has examined the record of trial proceedings. The defendant stands convicted after a bench trial before the Honorable Michael S. Kanne, late of this court and currently a Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Jennings v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Rockrohr v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
  4. People v. LawsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Barboza v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API