Legal Opinion

Highgate Development Corp. v. Kirsh

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 8, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

224 N.J. Super. 328 (1988)

540 A.2d 861

HIGHGATE DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL KIRSH AND MARCIA KIRSH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 16, 1987.

Decided April 8, 1988.

Before Judges GAULKIN, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.

Mitchell S. Camp, argued the cause for appellant.

Jack S. Zakim, argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Highgate Development Corp. (Highgate) brought this action to confirm an arbitration award entered against defendants Michael and Marcia…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. EgglestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. In Re Arbitration Between Grover and Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. O'MALLEY v. Petroleum Maintenance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Harmuth Engineering Co. v. Franklin Universal Building Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. China Minmetals Materials Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Wein v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Groesbeck v. LindenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  5. Scott v. Educational Testing ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API