Legal Opinion

Harmuth Engineering Co. v. Franklin Universal Building Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 25, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal challenges an order dated August 31, 1979 confirming an arbitration award and entering final judgment on behalf of plaintiff.

Defendant Franklin Universal Building Corporation and plaintiff Harmuth Engineering Company entered into a contract for the performance of construction work in Fairfield, New Jersey. Incorporated in the contract was a provision submitting all “disputes, claims or questions under the contract to binding arbitration.” The contract provided for the selection of the arbitrators in the following manner:

*383... Within three days after the demand for arbitration, each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Alfred Hofmann, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Standard Motor Freight, Inc. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 560, INTERN. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. NJ Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. MacH. Printers, Etc., US v. Merrill, Etc., WorksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Melvin P. Windsor, Inc. v. Mayflower Sav. & LoanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berry v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Highgate Development Corp. v. KirshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. City of Hartford v. Local 1716, Council 4, AFSCMEConnecticut Superior Court · 1996
  4. Labib v. YounanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API