Reynolds v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Although not addressed by either party to this appeal, we must address its interlocutory nature. As the judgment below did not dispose of all claims as to all parties, and the trial court did not certify it for immediate appeal, its immediate appeal would contravene the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Our review of the record reveals that: (1) defendant Reynolds’ counterclaim will remain viable only if summary judgment for him was not proper; and (2) the action for negligence against defendant Rivenbark will continue to be viable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- George Shinn Sports, Inc. v. Bahakel Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Tinkham (In re Outer Banks Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Rabun Cnty. Bank v. Highlands Land Holding Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014