Legal Opinion

George Shinn Sports, Inc. v. Bahakel Sports, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1990No. 8926SC901PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Defendant appeals from entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings wherein defendant alleged duress and other matters in defense of plaintiff’s claim for breach of an agreement giving plaintiff the option to purchase defendant’s partnership interest. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged the following: The parties, acting through their respective owners and agents, George Shinn for plaintiff, George Shinn Sports, Inc., and Cy Bahakel for defendant, Bahakel Sports, Inc., entered into a written Partnership Agreement on 16 June 1987…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Bigelow v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Reese v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Sutton v. MesserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Loyd v. GriffinNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API