Legal Opinion

City of Texarkana v. Brachfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1944No. 4-7431PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

This appeal presents for determination (1) whether a city of the first class has authority to require hotels therein to be licensed and regulated by the city, and (2) whether the procedure employed by the city of Texarkana in this case was valid and lawful.

City Ordinance No. B-439, entitled “an ordinance to provide a new method of licensing rooming houses and hotels,” may be summarized by sections, as follows:

“Section 1. That it shall be unlawful for any person to operate a hotel without obtaining and having unrevoked at all times a license under this ordinance.
“Section 2. Each applicant must…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Local Union No. 313, Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. StathakisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Spitler v. Town of MunsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lonoke v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Carpenter v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Rogers Group, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Rogers Group, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Billy/Dot, Inc. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Whiting v. ClaytonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API