Varriale v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
George Varriale v. State, No. 85, September Term 2014, Opinion by Greene, J. CRIMINAL LAW – SEARCH AND SEIZURE – CONSENT TO SEARCH – SUBSEQUENT USE OF DNA The use of a buccal swab inside a person’s cheek to obtain DNA samples for testing is a search. Generally, a DNA sample may be obtained from an individual for testing by consent, pursuant to a warrant, or other court order. If a person’s DNA profile created from a DNA sample is in the lawful possession of the police for examination by consent and does not exceed the scope of the consent given to conduct the search, there is no Fourth…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.