Legal Opinion

Wiley v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2006No. M2003-00661-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonE. Riley Anderson, J.

in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and CORNELIA A. CLARK, JJ., joined.

We granted the applications for permission to appeal filed by the State of Tennessee and the petitioner to determine 1) whether State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn.1999), which clarified the analysis for determining lesser-included offenses, created a new constitutional rule that must be applied retroactively to post-conviction cases, 2) whether the petitioner was entitled to post-conviction relief under the DNA Relief Act, and 3) whether the petitioner was denied his right…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by213 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. HatcherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Clarence Nesbit v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Tennessee v. Prince AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Irick v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API