Legal Opinion

Pindell v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. Hon. Thomas H. Bacon, Judge. The petition in this case alleges a failure to deliver the goods to consignee at Hannibal. The answer denies that the goods were received by the defendant. The instructions wholly ignore defendant’s duty to hold the wheat a reasonable length of time for inspection, and if not called for by the consignee, to safely store the wheat. Bell v. Railroad, 6 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas. Hon. Thomas H. Bacon, Judge. The petition in this case alleges a failure to deliver the goods to consignee at Hannibal. The answer denies that the goods were received by the defendant. The instructions wholly ignore defendant’s duty to hold the wheat a reasonable length of time for inspection, and if not called for by the consignee, to safely store the wheat. Bell v. Railroad, 6 Mo. App. 363 ; Machine Co. v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 203. Consignees should not be required to search over a city of fifteen thousand people, among the side-tracks, and places…

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is an action against the defendant as a common carrier, for the violation of a contract of affreightment. The petition is in the usual form, and alleges that defendant is a common carrier, and owned and operated a line of railway from Frankford, Pike county, Missouri, to the city of Hannibal, in said state. That on the twenty-fourth day of February, 1887, plaintiffs caused to be delivered to defendant at Frankford a carload of wheat, to be shipped and delivered to plaintiffs in said city of Hannibal, and that defendant received said wheat, but failed to deliver it to plaintiffs, whereby *679i…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gashweiler v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Buddy v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Wilson Sewing Machine Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Kansas City Transfer Co. v. NeiswangerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Bell v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Wichita Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Jones v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Keithley v. LuskMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Frank v. Grand Tower & Carbondale Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Here & Frerichs Chemical Co. v. LineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API