Legal Opinion

Keithley v. Lusk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Howell County Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This action is prosecuted to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by negligence of defendants as receivers of tbe St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company in transporting a car of apples. The trial court directed a verdict for defendants and plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment thereon.

The petition alleges that the plaintiffs delivered to the defendants at Burnham, this State, the car load of apples to be transported to Jonesboro, Arkansas; that it was agreed with the agent of defendants at Burnham that the car should be billed to Jonesboro and there rebilled to Clarendon,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Brown v. Wabash Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. MilnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Wall v. American Railway Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Walton, Jr. v. A.B.C. Fireproof Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API