Legal Opinion

Kenneth D. Oxborrow, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Norman Carlson, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1989No. C.A. 87-4440, 88-3522PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGUILAR, District Judge:

I

Appellant Oxborrow pled guilty to four state offenses stemming from his participation in a Ponzi pyramid investment scheme which defrauded approximately 900 to 1,200 investors. After unsuccessfully appealing his sentence to the Washington Supreme Court, Oxborrow filed a habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. The district court held that the admission of information at sentencing did not violate Oxborrow’s due process rights, but found that the imposition of consecutive sentences for counts one and two, which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Mike Hernandez v. Eddie S. Ylst, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Eddie L. Ayers, and Gregory R. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Villafuerte v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Bobby Lee HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API