Bogenholm ex rel. Bogenholm v. House
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellants Judith and Robert Bogenholm seek review of the trial court’s partial summary judgment issued pursuant to Minn.R. Civ.P. 54.02 in favor of respondent Diane *403Williams. On appeal, the Bogenholms argue that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude them from litigating their claims against Williams. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
This action arises out of an automobile collision that occurred on August 30, 1980, at 5 a.m. when twelve cheerleaders and one other student from Denfeld High School, Duluth, Minnesota,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986