Legal Opinion

Bogenholm ex rel. Bogenholm v. House

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1986No. C5-85-2278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Judith and Robert Bogenholm seek review of the trial court’s partial summary judgment issued pursuant to Minn.R. Civ.P. 54.02 in favor of respondent Diane *403Williams. On appeal, the Bogenholms argue that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude them from litigating their claims against Williams. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

This action arises out of an automobile collision that occurred on August 30, 1980, at 5 a.m. when twelve cheerleaders and one other student from Denfeld High School, Duluth, Minnesota,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API