Legal Opinion

Arminak & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 20, 2006No. SACV 04-1455CJCAJWXPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF NONINFRINGEMENT

CARNEY, District Judge.

This patent infringement case concerns two design patents for a device known as a “trigger sprayer shroud:” a plastic cover that fits over the pump mechanism used in plastic spray bottles. (Opposition Brief, p. 1.) Defendant Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc. (“Calmar”) asserts that Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Arminak and Associates (“Arminak”) infringed its United States Patents Nos. Des. 381,581 (the “ ’581 Patent”) and. Des. 377,602 (the “ ’602…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Arminak & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007