Legal Opinion
Murray v. Golden Rule Ins.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 19, 2014No. 1:12-cv-01012-JMS-DMLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Golden Rule Ins. Co./United-Healthcare Corp.’s (“Golden Rule”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [.Filing No. JJ.]1
*941I.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A motion for summary judgment asks the Court to find that a trial is unnecessary because there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, instead, the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). As the current version of Rule 56 makes clear, whether a party asserts that a fact is undisputed or genuinely disputed, the party must support the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alena Patton v. Markiovic S. Cardona and Alma J. CardonaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- CUNNINGHAM v. AUSTINDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Carlson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- HUNT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- PRYOR v. ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.