Legal Opinion
Hendershott v. Hendershott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from those parts of a judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Tenney, J.), entered August 31, 2001, that equitably distributed the parties’ marital property and denied plaintiffs request for maintenance.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law and facts by awarding plaintiff the Baja boat and the income tax refund in its entirety and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs. All findings of fact contained in the decision of the Trial Justice that are inconsistent with the memorandum herein are hereby…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffey v. CoffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Carney v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Prasinos v. PrasinosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Ferlo v. FerloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Francis v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015