Prasinos v. Prasinos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: It is well established that “[e]quitable distribution presents issues of fact to be resolved by the trial court, and its judgment should be upheld absent an abuse of discretion” (Munson v Munson, 250 AD2d 1004; see, Teabout v Teabout, 269 AD2d 719, 720; Ackley v Ackley, 100 AD2d 153, 156, lv dismissed 63 NY2d 605). It is evident from the record that Supreme Court took into consideration the relevant factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5) (d) in declining to make any equitable distribution of the marital property…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ackley v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Butler v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Goddard v. GoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- LaBarre v. LaBarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McPheeters v. McPheetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Niland v. NilandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Oliver v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kelly v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Rivera v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.