Legal Opinion

In re B.H.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 5, 2024No. 126487Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 126,487 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Interest of B.H., a Minor Child. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution recognizes a parent's relationship with his or her child is a protected liberty interest. This liberty interest acknowledges a parent's right to make decisions regarding the child's care, custody, and control. This fundamental right remains intact during a child in need of care (CINC) case. Even if a parent has his or her child removed from the parent's custody during a CINC case, the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API