Legal Opinion

Nunes v. Twitter, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 1, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-02843-VCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 73, 85, 92

VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge

Twitter contends it cannot be liable under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for the unwanted tweets it delivered via text message to the plaintiffs cell phone, because it should not be considered the one responsible for sending those text messages. Twitter also argues that, even if it could be liable under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, it would be immunized from liability under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. John Green v. America Online (Aol) John Does 1 & 2Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Soppet v. ENHANCED RECOVERY CO., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holt v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Spiegel v. EngageTel Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Cunningham v. MontesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Serban v. Cargurus, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Spiegel v. EngagetelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API