Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gagliardi v. Flack

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1989No. Docket 110246Published

1DissentMurphy, P.J.

I dissent.

I am in complete agreement with the analysis, reasoning and holdings in both Horan v Brown, 148 Mich App 464; 384 NW2d 805 (1986), lv den 425 Mich 876 (1986), and Mielke v Waterman, 145 *77Mich App 22; 377 NW2d 328 (1985), lv den 424 Mich 873 (1985), which reflect the current state of the law in Michigan.

In Horan, supra, a case directly on point, this Court clearly and unequivocally held that a cause of action for damages for noneconomic losses from a serious impairment of body function does not accrue until the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the serious impairment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bond v. GallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Byer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dickerson v. Brind Truck LeasingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API